It is currently September 8th, 2010, 6:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 17th, 2009, 8:17 pm 
Offline
Gettin' wiser now.

Joined: November 8th, 2007, 8:44 pm
Posts: 1312
Location: Central Connecticut, USA (07 F650 GS)
Thanks again, I wont try to blind myself. I'll ask a neighbor to watch it for me.

_________________
Inmate # 2433 -- 07 F650 GS
SmugMug referral code ( TZw794Hbea1QY ) get $5 off.
Other Bikes: 83 H*nda CX650C restoration, 2000 R1100R converting to a Revamp, 83 Suz*k* GS450L to Cafe, and a Schwein 50cc Scooter.


When you get too old to serve as a bad example, you can always give bad advice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 17th, 2009, 9:02 pm 
Offline
Gettin' wiser now.

Joined: October 1st, 2002, 5:57 am
Posts: 2169
Location: Norway, (F650GS)
This is NOT my HID bulb- found this online. My bulb is actually shorter in lenght behind the reflector than a normal H4 bulb.
Image

_________________
Image
haakon#626 (Norway, 2000- F650GS)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 17th, 2009, 11:05 pm 
Offline
Gettin' wiser now.

Joined: November 8th, 2007, 8:44 pm
Posts: 1312
Location: Central Connecticut, USA (07 F650 GS)
I was wondering if the whole bulb moves. It does. Now if it could fire photon torpedoes.

_________________
Inmate # 2433 -- 07 F650 GS
SmugMug referral code ( TZw794Hbea1QY ) get $5 off.
Other Bikes: 83 H*nda CX650C restoration, 2000 R1100R converting to a Revamp, 83 Suz*k* GS450L to Cafe, and a Schwein 50cc Scooter.


When you get too old to serve as a bad example, you can always give bad advice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 18th, 2009, 4:05 am 
Offline
Should know their way around F650.com

Joined: October 14th, 2009, 12:43 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Bombay, India
Flash wrote:
HID does it at a lower power consumption of about 35W, after less than one minute warm-up period


I'm planning to install a Bi-Xenon HID on my 2002 Dakar with a switch in the low\high beam headlight supply (the White\Yellow wire) to shut off the headlight during the day (the parking light is always on). However, I will still be able to use my passing light\flasher (the switch you operate with your left index finger) since it draws its supply from another source (a Green\Black wire that also goes to the horn).

Now, I have 3 questions:

1. With reference to the "warm up" time for a HID bulb, does this indeed mean that for the above setup, the passing switch function will be essentially useless during the day when the headlight is off, since you won't be able to perform a "momentary flash" of the lights like in a halogen bulb?

2. Is there any other type of Bi-Xenon bulb\system that overcomes the "warm-up time" limitation? (Having a "secondary halogen" filament for the high beam is not an acceptable solution).

3. Disregarding the issue of warm-up time for a moment, since an HID bulb passes an arc of current, will frequent and repeated use of the passing switch cause some kind of damage? I know that this isn't the case with halogen filaments since I've been flashing them lights for years now, but what about an HID bulb?

Thanks in advance.

_________________
Image
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics - even if you win, you're still retarded.

* Inmate #F6502748; 2002 F650GS Dakar; 2000 Bajaj Legend (150 cc scooter)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 18th, 2009, 5:44 am 
Offline
Wise Old Timer

Joined: October 24th, 2002, 12:45 pm
Posts: 3592
BADJAG wrote:
1. With reference to the "warm up" time for a HID bulb, does this indeed mean that for the above setup, the passing switch function will be essentially useless during the day when the headlight is off, since you won't be able to perform a "momentary flash" of the lights like in a halogen bulb?

2. Is there any other type of Bi-Xenon bulb\system that overcomes the "warm-up time" limitation? (Having a "secondary halogen" filament for the high beam is not an acceptable solution).

3. Disregarding the issue of warm-up time for a moment, since an HID bulb passes an arc of current, will frequent and repeated use of the passing switch cause some kind of damage? I know that this isn't the case with halogen filaments since I've been flashing them lights for years now, but what about an HID bulb

1. Not at all. During the ignition phase, the light is brighter than normal for a few seconds. However, during that time, the ballast is drawing maximum current. BTW running with your headlight off is a BAD idea with respect to visibility to other motorists.

2. Unnecessary. See 1.

3. I would suspect that frequently running it at the higher voltage and current of the ignition phase probably shortens the system lifetime versus running it on all the time. However, the light being off much of the (bike running) time would lengthen the life of the system. Do these two cancel each other out? I have no idea. What would be the first item to fail in a system run that way, the lamp or the ballast? Again, I have no idea.

_________________
Click here for Gathering Speed - Tales of Motorcycles and Life


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 18th, 2009, 7:57 am 
Offline
Should know their way around F650.com

Joined: October 14th, 2009, 12:43 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Bombay, India
Thanks Flash. I guess I'll play it safe and ease off that passing switch. Too bad, I used to love flashing that light.

Flash wrote:
BTW, running with your headlight off is a BAD idea with respect to visibility to other motorists


That would certainly make sense in a place like the US, which has the following vehicle statistics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_ ... ted_States

Total 2-wheeler population: 6,686,000
Total 4-wheeler population (automobiles + SUVs): 234,000,000
(approx)

That's a ratio of 1 bike for around 33 cars! No wonder you guys are so paranoid about being visible!

On the other hand, you really should ride around India once (not sure if you visited here during your trip in 2000). It's a whole different ballgame out here. This is the world's largest two-wheeler market, and the dynamics of the road are very different.

Sample this statistic from a road survey of vehicles in India: http://www.cybersteering.com/pulmain/stats/vpop.html

Total 2-wheeler population: 25,915,000
Total 4-wheeler population (cars + "jeeps" - ie, MUVs): 4,300,000
(approx)

In effect, every car is surrounded by six bikes at a time. Talk about the tables being turned! Here, it's the cagers who have to look out for themselves, while the bikers rule the roads! Yay!

There's another funny (and irritating) aspect about riding in the day with your headlight on. Nobody here does it, and as a result, if they see your headlight, they assume you've left it on inadvertently. Ergo, you'll see everybody - pedestrians, pillion riders, sometimes even motorists in the oncoming lane(!) - make that blinking motion at you with their hands, or point to your headlight.

While stopped at a signal, I unfailingly get people telling me nicely that I've forgotten to switch off my headlight (what a retard I must be!) as they cross in front of me. Frankly, I've gotten tired of politely telling them that's how the manufacturer designed the damn bike in the first place. Each time, their reaction is always raised eyebrows, followed with "Now why on earth would they do that?!". Trust me, even with the headlight off, I'll have people (especially kids) pointing to my parking light to tell me I've forgotten to switch that off too!

This vast difference between our biking cultures never fails to amuse me when I read how bikers in this forum constantly worry that cars are "out to get us". I guess we Indian bikers have one less worry to deal with!

_________________
Image
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics - even if you win, you're still retarded.

* Inmate #F6502748; 2002 F650GS Dakar; 2000 Bajaj Legend (150 cc scooter)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 18th, 2009, 9:08 am 
Offline
Wise Old Timer

Joined: October 24th, 2002, 12:45 pm
Posts: 3592
BADJAG wrote:
On the other hand, you really should ride around India once (not sure if you visited here during your trip in 2000). It's a whole different ballgame out here.

I visited India in April of this year for a ride in the Himalayas with Xxaarraa.

Image

While I imagine folks telling you to turn off your headlight all the time could get old after a while, NOT having them run into you would never get old.

Riding in India is way more exciting than road racing in the USA.

_________________
Click here for Gathering Speed - Tales of Motorcycles and Life


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 18th, 2009, 9:12 am 
Offline
Gettin' wiser now.

Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 10:25 am
Posts: 1009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Flash 412 (CO) wrote:
Here is more explanation. For an H4 HID (the kind without a halogen high beam), the hot spot itself moves. If you do not connect power to the ballast and only have the solenoid connection active at the lamp, you can watch this happen as you flash-2-pass (and release). If the power to the ballast is connected and the lamp illuminates when you try this, you can't see much for very long because it is similar to looking at the sun.

On at a standard H4 bub, there are two separate filaments in a line that extends more or less from the brake light through the headlight. VME HID uses a solenoid to move the spot position along this axis. Standard H4 bubs illuminate one filament as the other filament extinguishes. For a moving-spot HID, "high beam" versus "low beam" is ONLY an issue of a difference beam cutoff caused by the different spot location and the shielding in the lens/reflector assembly. A standard H4 not only changes the beam cutoff, but it also generally produces more lumens on high than it does on low, which is why the most common H4 lamp is 55/65W. The HID does not need to produce more lumens as it already produces five times as many as a halogen lamp, and HID does it at a lower power consumption of about 35W, after less than one minute warm-up period. The HID lamp draws maximum current when cold and you first turn it on.

(I *am* an electrical engineer. I used to be involved in visual display systems for a major technology company. But now I am unemployed. Got work?)


Thanks Flash! I knew you would correct my layman's explanation.

_________________
Regards,
Mark
-------------------------------
`97.5 BMW F650 (flammrot)
Inmate #2745 (Booked Sept. 2008; Incarcerated Oct. 2009)

"That's so stupid a monkey wouldn't do it." -Aganon

Hey FAQ you! http://faq.f650.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 19th, 2009, 1:37 am 
Offline
Should know their way around F650.com

Joined: October 14th, 2009, 12:43 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Bombay, India
Flash wrote:
While I imagine folks telling you to turn off your headlight all the time could get old after a while, NOT having them run into you would never get old


Good point. I do use the headlight while on the highways, just not in the city. Besides, when faced with a truck\lorry coming at you in your lane because it wants to overtake a slower vehicle on a two-lane road, and with its driver most likely drunk (it's customary for truckers to down a peg or two before they set off), no amount of flashing or honking is going to save you. I've lost count of the number of times I've been run off the road like this.

Flash wrote:
Riding in India is way more exciting than road racing in the USA.


In that case, after 12 years of riding across India, it's good to know I haven't missed much in the way of excitement. :)

Now, before I'm accused of going off topic, I'd like to add that I did an install of my cheap-ass, unbranded Chinese HID system yesterday and observed that the light actually became brighter as time passed, reaching its final intensity around 20 seconds after turning it on. I didn't look directly at the light of course, but at the point on the ground where the low beam fell.

Flash wrote:
During the ignition phase, the light is brighter than normal for a few seconds


Any ideas on what could be the reason for my HID's contradictory behaviour, Flash? Has anyone else experienced this condition?

_________________
Image
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics - even if you win, you're still retarded.

* Inmate #F6502748; 2002 F650GS Dakar; 2000 Bajaj Legend (150 cc scooter)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 19th, 2009, 8:42 am 
Offline
Gettin' wiser now.

Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 10:25 am
Posts: 1009
Location: Buffalo, NY
BADJAG wrote:
Now, before I'm accused of going off topic, I'd like to add that I did an install of my cheap-ass, unbranded Chinese HID system yesterday and observed that the light actually became brighter as time passed, reaching its final intensity around 20 seconds after turning it on. I didn't look directly at the light of course, but at the point on the ground where the low beam fell.

Flash wrote:
During the ignition phase, the light is brighter than normal for a few seconds


Any ideas on what could be the reason for my HID's contradictory behaviour, Flash? Has anyone else experienced this condition?


My VVME kit works the same way. The light doesn't reach full intensity until about 5-10 seconds.

_________________
Regards,
Mark
-------------------------------
`97.5 BMW F650 (flammrot)
Inmate #2745 (Booked Sept. 2008; Incarcerated Oct. 2009)

"That's so stupid a monkey wouldn't do it." -Aganon

Hey FAQ you! http://faq.f650.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 19th, 2009, 9:33 am 
Offline
Wise Old Timer

Joined: October 24th, 2002, 12:45 pm
Posts: 3592
mcstark wrote:
My VVME kit works the same way. The light doesn't reach full intensity until about 5-10 seconds.
D'oh! You are correct. I was thinking of the HID on another bike I have. It uses separate H1 and an H3 bubs for hi and low. So it has two ballasts. THOSE units are brighter during ignition.

While the VME HID unit is SLIGHTLY dimmer during ignition (and brightens as it warms up for a few seconds), it is still brighter than a standard halogen lamp and WAY brighter than no headlight at all.

_________________
Click here for Gathering Speed - Tales of Motorcycles and Life


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: November 19th, 2009, 4:36 pm 
Offline
Gettin' wiser now.

Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 10:25 am
Posts: 1009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Flash 412 (CO) wrote:
mcstark wrote:
My VVME kit works the same way. The light doesn't reach full intensity until about 5-10 seconds.
D'oh! You are correct. I was thinking of the HID on another bike I have. It uses separate H1 and an H3 bubs for hi and low. So it has two ballasts. THOSE units are brighter during ignition.

While the VME HID unit is SLIGHTLY dimmer during ignition (and brightens as it warms up for a few seconds), it is still brighter than a standard halogen lamp and WAY brighter than no headlight at all.


OK, that makes sense. It takes a bit for the ballast to crank the voltage from 12v to 23000v to get the ignitor to fire. That would explain the humming when I turn the ignition on. As a side note, I would never leave the key in the "On" position without starting the motor. During the start up of the HID, that puppy draws some serious current - approx 96 watts according to the VVME website. Then it tapers off to about 40-45 watts (35 for the lamp, and 5-10 for the ballast). But it's putting out 3200 lumens using 4-45 watts, while my old Silverstar bulb put out 900 lumens on low beam (55w), and 1500 lumens on high beam (65w). That is why HID kicks butt, especially on a motorcycle.

_________________
Regards,
Mark
-------------------------------
`97.5 BMW F650 (flammrot)
Inmate #2745 (Booked Sept. 2008; Incarcerated Oct. 2009)

"That's so stupid a monkey wouldn't do it." -Aganon

Hey FAQ you! http://faq.f650.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2010, 3:55 pm 
Offline
Should know their way around F650.com

Joined: March 26th, 2009, 10:13 am
Posts: 304
Location: NW Connecticut
Sorry to be bringing up an old post, but now that there have been a number of installations of the VVME bi xenon kits, anyone have a recommendation whether I should go with the Standard or Slim? I'll be putting in my '97 Classic.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2010, 6:56 pm 
Offline
Gettin' wiser now.

Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 10:25 am
Posts: 1009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Evan E wrote:
Sorry to be bringing up an old post, but now that there have been a number of installations of the VVME bi xenon kits, anyone have a recommendation whether I should go with the Standard or Slim? I'll be putting in my '97 Classic.


If I were to do it over again, I would but the slim kit. The upcharge is minimal and the smaller size makes it easier to find a mounting place.

_________________
Regards,
Mark
-------------------------------
`97.5 BMW F650 (flammrot)
Inmate #2745 (Booked Sept. 2008; Incarcerated Oct. 2009)

"That's so stupid a monkey wouldn't do it." -Aganon

Hey FAQ you! http://faq.f650.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HID H4: Moving Spot or Secondary Halogen?
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2010, 8:43 pm 
Offline
Should know their way around F650.com

Joined: March 26th, 2009, 10:13 am
Posts: 304
Location: NW Connecticut
Quote:
If I were to do it over again, I would but the slim kit. The upcharge is minimal and the smaller size makes it easier to find a mounting place.


Thanks, I was thinking that myself. It seems that it has a slightly better warranty as well. I really like the way you mounted your ballast--I'm going to try something similar.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot], zapkat and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group